翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Daniels House (Bentonville, Arkansas) ・ Daniels Mill ・ Daniels Mill (Daniels, Maryland) ・ Daniels Mill, Shropshire ・ Daniels Motor Company ・ Daniels Motorsport ・ Daniels Pavļuts ・ Daniels Range ・ Daniels Recital Hall ・ Daniels Run ・ Daniels Town Hall ・ Daniels v Campbell ・ Daniels v Canada ・ Daniels v Thompson ・ Daniels v. City of New York ・ Daniels v. United States ・ Daniels, Maryland ・ Daniels, West Virginia ・ Daniels, Wisconsin ・ Danielsen ・ Danielson ・ Danielson (crater) ・ Danielson Airport ・ Danielson Ferreira Trindade ・ Danielson Gomes Monteiro ・ Danielson Heliport ・ Danielson Main Street Historic District ・ Danielson Township, Meeker County, Minnesota ・ Danielson, Connecticut ・ Danielsson Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Daniels v. United States ： ウィキペディア英語版 Daniels v. United States ''Daniels v. United States'', (531 U.S. 374 ) (2001), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984. The Court ruled, in a 5-4 decision, that a defendant sentenced under that Act could not challenge previous convictions on appeal that were used to increase his new sentence. ==Background and lower court proceedings== In 1994, Earthy D. Daniels, Jr., was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Under the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, which imposes a mandatory minimum 15-year sentence on anyone convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and who has three previous convictions for a violent felony, Daniels' sentence was enhanced.〔(532 U.S. 374 ) at 376.〕 After an unsuccessful appeal, Daniels filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence. Daniels argued that his sentence violated the Constitution because it was based in part on two prior convictions that were themselves unconstitutional. The District Court denied the motion. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision, reasoning that they could only review those prior convictions if a ''Gideon'' violation was alleged.〔(532 U.S. 374 ) at 378.〕 Daniels sought review in the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Daniels v. United States」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.